๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 851+ reviews
Toysโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

1961 Topps Leo Posada Rookie

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.2 out of 5(851 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$4
$6.67
Sale
โœ“ complimentary fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

1961 Topps Leo Posada RookieKansas City Athletics

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

1961 Topps Leo Posada Rookie

1961 Topps Leo Posada Rookie

Kansas City Athletics​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1985613

Category: Toys > Sports Trading Cards > Baseball Trading Cards

Original Price:$6.67 USD

Sale Price:$4 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand merely-arrived

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 9898 reviews
JB​
Justin Baker โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Kansas City, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So happy with this
it works as described which feels reasonable.
17 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Denver, CO

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A+ quality
At first, the 1961 Topps Leo Posada Rookie does its job and Iโ€™m satisfied.
26 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Kansas City, MO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Brilliant 1961 Topps Leo Posada Rookie
No complaints at this price.
2 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Phoenix, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Fantastic product
From my experience, the 1961 Topps Leo Posada Rookie works fine and it works for me. Arrived on time.
44 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker
4 months ago ยท Austin, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
magnificent quality
After a few use, the 1961 Topps Leo Posada Rookie feels solid so no complaints.
26 people found this helpful